Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 MAY 2014

Witness immunity - not down the drain?

This case explores the continuing applicability of the doctrine of witness immunity, for experts and their employers.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Young v Hones [2013] NSWSC 1429

In this edition of Expert Matters John Temple-Cole, Partner and Alex Viniarsky, Senior Business Analyst in our Sydney office, discuss a case which explores the continuing applicability of the doctrine of witness immunity for experts, and their employers.

Background

Ms Young and Mr and Mrs King were neighbours living in Forestville in suburban Sydney. The Kings' property was at a lower level than Ms Young's property. This meant that drainage from Ms Young's property was via a trench onto the Kings' property.

In mid-2001, the Kings undertook building work which involved excavation on the Kings' side of the common boundary, taking their ground level to about 90cm below Ms Young's property. Ms Young formed the view this work was being done without council approval. And it was, although the Warringah Council granted development consent for relevant works in February 2002, requiring suitable drainage to be installed behind the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from