Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 FEBRUARY 2018

Upset by the offset - and other statutory demand traps

Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Contributor
Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth is Australia’s leading independent law firm. We provide exceptional legal...

View firm profile
Explore more from Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Where there is a credit dispute, creditors could risk time and money in issuing a statutory demand that may be set aside.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

This week's TGIF considers the decision of In the matter of Trico Constructions Pty Limited [2017] NSWSC 1831 and the broader question of when creditors should – and should not – issue statutory demands.

BACKGROUND

Trico Constructions (Company) subcontracted Autolift Garage Doors (Creditor) to install two garage doors at a residential property. The Creditor did not complete the work by the date specified, but issued a tax invoice in the belief that the delay was accepted (and at least partly caused) by the Company.

After the Company failed to pay, the Creditor issued a statutory demand (Demand) under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act). The Company then applied for an order setting aside the Demand.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from