Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 FEBRUARY 2011

The extension of time limits for commencing arbitration - lessons from the Anglian Water case

Contracts providing for multi-tiered dispute resolution through distinct stages or "tiers" of dispute resolution processes, culminating in final and binding resolution by arbitration or litigation, often also contain barring provisions. These clauses typically require a party to submit certain notices, in a specified manner, to a specified address and within a specified timeframe.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Key Points:
A court can sometimes extend the time limits for commencing arbitration.

Contracts providing for multi-tiered dispute resolution through distinct stages or "tiers" of dispute resolution processes, culminating in final and binding resolution by arbitration or litigation, often also contain barring provisions. These clauses typically require a party to submit certain notices, in a specified manner, to a specified address and within a specified timeframe.

A failure to comply with the notice requirements may mean that the claimant's right to proceed to arbitration is barred. However, in some circumstances a court, or the tribunal itself, may have the power to extend this time, giving a party the opportunity to proceed on to arbitration despite not strictly meeting the contract's notice requirements.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from