Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 APRIL 2011

The burden of proving causation in claims for contributory negligence or contribution

The defendant carries the onus of establishing causation if claiming contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff or a reduction in damages based on the negligence of the plaintiff's employer under s 151Z Workers Compensation Act 1987 (WCA). The defendant must lead evidence, in some cases expert evidence, of the reasonable practicability of alternative safety measures contended by it to have been available to the plaintiff and/or employer, unless they were a matter of common sense. In or

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The burden of proving causation in claims for contributory negligence or contribution

Judgment date: 4 April 2011

Varga v Galea [2011] NSWCA 76

New South Wales Court of Appeal1

In Brief

  • The defendant carries the onus of establishing causation if claiming contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff or a reduction in damages based on the negligence of the plaintiff's employer under s 151Z Workers Compensation Act 1987 (WCA).
  • The defendant must lead evidence, in some cases expert evidence, of the reasonable practicability of alternative safety measures contended by it to have been available to the plaintiff and/or employer, unless they were a matter of common sense.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from