Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 JUNE 2026

TGIF 29 May 2026 – When Will A Court Discount A Receiver’s Remuneration?

Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Contributor
Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth is Australia’s leading independent law firm. We provide exceptional legal...

View firm profile
Explore more from Corrs Chambers Westgarth

This week’s TGIF considers the recent decision of the Queensland Supreme Court in White Rook Pty Ltd v White Horizon Pty Ltd (No 2) [2026] QSC 86 where the Court applied proportionality principles and reduced a court-appointed receiver’s remuneration by 15%.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

This week’s TGIF considers the recent decision of the Queensland Supreme Court in White Rook Pty Ltd v White Horizon Pty Ltd (No 2) [2026] QSC 86 where the Court applied proportionality principles and reduced a court-appointed receiver’s remuneration by 15%.

This case related to an application by a court-appointed receiver for approval of remuneration, costs and expenses incurred over the course of a 15-year receivership.  

The Supreme Court of Queensland fixed the receiver’s remuneration at a 15% reduction from the amount claimed.

In fixing the remuneration, the Court considered the sufficiency of the evidence to support the remuneration claimed, proportionality principles, the receiver’s obligation to exercise commercial judgement. The Court also considered the receiver’s failure to: 

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

    Lawyers Weekly Law firm of the year 2021                  
Employer of Choice for Gender Equality (WGEA)

See more popular content from