Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 APRIL 2026

Scope Of Non-Delegable Duties Of Care Refined

In a landmark decision, the High Court of Australia determined that a non-delegable duty of care may be breached by the intentional conduct of a delegate, overturning longstanding authority of New South Wales v Lepore (2003) 212 CLR 511, which found that a common law non-delegable duty could not arise in respect of harm caused by an intentional criminal act. The decision significantly refines the scope and operation of non-delegable duties in Australian law.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

AA v The Trustees of the Roman Catholic Church for the Diocese of Maitland-Newcastle [2026] HCA 2

Content warning: this article discusses child sexual abuse and may be distressing for some readers.

Overview

In a landmark decision, the High Court of Australia determined that a non-delegable duty of care may be breached by the intentional conduct of a delegate, overturning longstanding authority of New South Wales v Lepore (2003) 212 CLR 511, which found that a common law non-delegable duty could not arise in respect of harm caused by an intentional criminal act. The decision significantly refines the scope and operation of non-delegable duties in Australian law.

Background

The appellant, AA (a pseudonym), commenced proceedings in the Supreme Court of New South Wales in 2024, alleging that he was sexually abused on multiple occasions during the 1960s by Father Ronald Pickin, a priest of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Maitland-Newcastle (the Diocese).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from