Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 FEBRUARY 2019

Party autonomy and the new regime of institutional arbitration

Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Contributor
Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth is Australia’s leading independent law firm. We provide exceptional legal...

View firm profile
Explore more from Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Key aspects of ICC Note to Parties and Arbitral Tribunals on the Conduct of the Arbitration under the ICC Rules of Arbitration.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In recent years, there has been much criticism of the cost and extended timetables of international commercial arbitration.

International arbitral institutions have responded in a variety of ways. Common amongst these are expedited arbitration rules, increased scrutiny of awards and accountability of arbitrators and tribunals and, increasingly, imposts on arbitrators who do not publish awards within specified time periods.

The domestic courts of many jurisdictions have also made a contribution – with decisive judgments in aid of arbitration, including enforcement both of arbitration agreements and of foreign arbitral awards.

Whilst these developments have been welcomed by the arbitration community, the publication of the updated ICC Note to Parties and Arbitral Tribunals on the Conduct of the Arbitration under the ICC Rules of Arbitration (ICC Notes) on 1 January 2019 invites further reflection.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

    Lawyers Weekly Law firm of the year 2021                  
Employer of Choice for Gender Equality (WGEA)

See more popular content from