Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 MAY 2009

Offer Of Compromise - Two Months Within Hearing - Beware The Pitfalls

Case Notes from the Court of Appeal decision of Pittorino v Yates relating to the service of an Offer of Compromise less than 2 months before hearing and whether enforceable where plaintiff is refused an extension of time if the request is deemed reasonable.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Pittorino v Yates [2009] NSWCA 87
Judgment of Beazley JA, Tobias JA and Handley AJA

In Brief

  • In determining whether the time allowed for acceptance of an Offer of Compromise made within two months of a hearing date is reasonable in all the circumstances, a Court will consider circumstances occurring after the date on which the offer was made.

Background

  • The plaintiff's claim arose out of a motor vehicle accident which occurred in 2004. The plaintiff sustained orthopaedic injuries including a fractured dislocation of her C6/C7 vertebra.
  • The plaintiff's solicitor qualified Dr Hopcroft, a general surgeon. The defendant relied on reports by Dr Matheson, a neurosurgeon, and Dr Blue, an orthopaedic surgeon.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from