Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 AUGUST 2015

Liquidated damages post Andrews - a double-edged sword

Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Contributor
Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth is Australia’s leading independent law firm. We provide exceptional legal...

View firm profile
Explore more from Corrs Chambers Westgarth

A recent case in Queensland (IPN Medical) has provided clear guidance for penalties and liquidated damages clauses.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The Andrews and Paciocco cases have generated a lot of publicity around the law of penalties. Many articles have been written urging suppliers and customers to reconsider key provisions in contracts to ensure they are not penalties.

But a recent case in Queensland (IPN Medical1) has provided clear guidance when it comes to liquidated damages clauses.

The outcome in IPN Medical confirms that suppliers will have a hard task trying to prove that any pre-agreed amount should be struck out as a penalty.

On the flipside, the sting for customers is that valid liquidated damages clauses act as a limitation of liability. The trick is to make sure the liquidated damages clause protects all benefits of the bargain.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from