Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 JANUARY 2012

Issues of causation in asbestos case

In addition to the substantial award of damages, this decision on appeal also considers issues of uncertain causation.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Allison Hunt
Allison Hunt
David Guthrie
David Guthrie
Author LinkedIn connections

On 30 August 2011, a Victorian Supreme Court jury returned a verdict in favour of a plaintiff suffering from mesothelioma in the amount of $1,150,000. The case is the first asbestos-related personal injury proceeding to run to verdict in Victoria in a number of years.

In addition to the substantial award of damages, the decision on appeal by the Victorian Supreme Court confronts similar issues of uncertain causation to those in Evans v Queanbeyan City Council [2011] NSWCA 230 (discussed in the September edition of the Public law report).

Background

On 29 March 2011, Eric King (the plaintiff) commenced proceedings against Amaca Pty Ltd (formerly James Hardie & Coy Pty Ltd) (Amaca) seeking damages in respect of mesothelioma he allegedly contracted as a result of exposure to asbestos.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from