Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 FEBRUARY 2026

Failure to warn: Wallace v Kam prevails again

Recent case emphasises the importance of causation in failure to warn cases & that documentation is paramount.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The plaintiff brought a claim against a urologist and a Local Health District in negligence, breach of contract and breach of statutory guarantees. In line with the principles of Wallace v Kam, the claim failed on all three causes of action.

In issue

  • The plaintiff brought a claim for damages in the Supreme Court of NSW against her treating urologist, Dr Prem Rashid (first defendant) and local health district, Mid North Coast Local Area Health District (the LHD) alleging personal injury arising from complications following a surgical procedure performed on 8 July 2013.
  • The plaintiff alleged negligence by way of failure to adequately warn of the surgical risks and improper performance of the actual surgery. The plaintiff further alleged a breach of contract and statutory guarantees.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from