Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 FEBRUARY 2007

EK Nominees Pty Ltd v Woolworths Ltd Case Summary

In the recent decision in EK Nominees Pty Ltd v Woolworths Ltd [2006] NSWSC 1172, non-disclosure by Woolworths was held to amount to misleading and deceptive conduct in contravention of s 52 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) (TPA).

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In the recent decision in EK Nominees Pty Ltd v Woolworths Ltd [2006] NSWSC 1172, non-disclosure by Woolworths was held to amount to misleading and deceptive conduct in contravention of s 52 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) (TPA). This case is a reminder of the importance of disclosure in commercial negotiations where there is a reasonable expectation that disclosure will be made and the risk of silence in these cases.

The facts

Woolworths was interested in establishing a supermarket in Auburn, New South Wales. Since at least 1995, it had engaged in negotiations with a third party regarding a preferred site in Queen Street, Auburn. Negotiations for this site subsequently failed.

In 1998, Woolworths commenced negotiations for a supermarket site with the plaintiff, EK Nominees, a developer and the owner of a site in Auburn Road, Auburn.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from