Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 AUGUST 2018

Defamatory statements against McDonalds owner comes back to bite defendant

This case highlights the need to act on receipt of legal proceedings, to avoid a default judgment and possible damages.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Defamatory posts on Facebook costs defendant after recent Victorian Supreme Court decision.

In brief: Defamatory posts on Facebook about a McDonalds' owner has resulted in the person who posted them coughing up $200,000 in damages after a recent decision of the Victorian Supreme Court1.

Take home points:

  • Do not ignore legal proceedings – the Defendant failed to file a defence and a judgment was made in default of defence (without a trial). The Court then had to hear evidence to determine the award of damages.
  • You do not need to name the person in your post – if they can be identified (in this case "the owner of the local McDonalds") this is sufficient for defamation laws to apply.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from