Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 MARCH 2026

Defamation: Serious harm and media accountability

This decision is a reminder of the steps which need to be taken and criteria to be satisfied in order to successfully rely on the defences of honest opinion, statutory qualified privilege and justification under the Defamation Act 2005.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Warning: This article contains details about sexual assault which may be upsetting for some readers. Reader discretion is advised.

The Archbishop of the Australian Greek Orthodox Church has successfully sued a journalist for defamation regarding four articles posted on the journalist's website.

The Court found that the articles conveyed numerous defamatory imputations. The journalist failed to establish any defence. He was ordered to pay damages of $250,000 plus aggravated damages of $50,000 and the Archbishop's legal costs. A permanent injunction was also granted against the journalist.

In issue

The main issues to be determined were:

  • whether the defamatory imputations alleged by the Archbishop were carried;

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from