Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 JUNE 2015

Dangerous Recreational Activity - to jump or not to jump - an obvious risk?

The court considered the provisions in the Civil Liability Act 2003 (NSW) relating to dangerous recreational activity.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In Stewart v Ackland 2015(ACTCA)1 the ACT Court of Appeal recently considered the application of the provisions in the Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) (CLA) relating to dangerous recreational activity.

On 10 October 2009, the Respondent, Mr Ackland, broke his neck causing permanent tetraplegia when performing a backwards somersault or back flip on an amusement device called a jumping pillow. The jumping pillow was situated on a farm in rural New South Wales where the Appellants conducted an amusement park.

In the District Court there was a judgment in favour of the Plaintiff for about $4.6 million. The main issue in the trial was whether the activity engaged in by Mr Ackland at the time he was injured was a dangerous recreational activity within the meaning of that expression in Section 5L(1) of the CLA, and secondly whether the risk which eventuated had been an obvious risk as defined by Section 5K.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from