Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

VIDEO · 11 NOVEMBER 2021

Concurrent Evidence Practices Survey

The survey indicated overwhelming support for the use of concurrent evidence as a method of examining expert witnesses.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The results.

The Concurrent Evidence Practices Survey provides insights into both experiences and expectations in relation to concurrent evidence from a cross-section of counsel, judges, experts and lawyers.

KordaMentha, in conjunction with the Australian Bar Association ('ABA'), surveyed a cross-section of stakeholders for their experiences and expectations when giving, taking or hearing expert evidence concurrently.

The participants were generally very experienced; over 60% had more than 15 years' experience in their current role and around 90% had experience in the superior courts. Nonetheless, over 60% of participants had less than 10 instances involving concurrent evidence, suggesting it still a relatively emerging method of examining expert witnesses.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from