Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 JULY 2020

Cardinal George Pell and football

In a unanimous judgement, the High Court found the evidence did not establish guilt to the requisite standard of proof.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

On 7 April 2020 the High Court of Australia unanimously allowed Cardinal George Pell's appeal against his convictions for 5 charges of sexual assault after two trials and an unsuccessful appeal to the Full Court of the Victorian Court of Appeal.

It is useful to consider the process against the background of football. As an example, to put this in perspective, consider the following:

  1. The Plaintiff brings action in the District Court in a civil action and obtains judgement against the Defendant. [Score: Plaintiff – 1, Defendant – 0]
  2. Defendant appeals to the Supreme Court. The appeal is heard before a single judge. The appeal is dismissed. [Score: Plaintiff – 1, Defendant – 0]

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from