Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 NOVEMBER 2025

Bird strike - Driver left with nobody to sue

Recent case held that properly parked cars aren't "in use" for liability & drivers can't claim no-fault damages if their own actions contributed to the crash.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In Brief

  • Pursuant to section 1.4 of the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017, the "use or operation" or a motor vehicle includes the parking of the vehicle.
  • The time a vehicle has been parked is relevant to whether it continues to be "in use" at the time a motor accident occurs.
  • Even if a parked vehicle remains " in use " at the time of a motor accident, its owner is not liable unless there is some fault in the way that the vehicle was parked.
  • Pursuant to section 5.4 of MAIA, a driver is precluded from recovering damages, pursuant to the "no-fault" provisions in Part 5 of MAIA, if the accident was caused by some act or omission by that driver.
  • The preclusion in s 5.4 applies even if the driver's act or omission was involuntary, does not amount to fault and was not the sole or primary cause of the accident.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from