Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 NOVEMBER 2014

Australian Financial Services and Leasing Pty Ltd v Hills Industries Ltd

Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Contributor
Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth is Australia’s leading independent law firm. We provide exceptional legal...

View firm profile
Explore more from Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Summary of a recent High Court decision which considered the change of position defence.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
James Lucek-Rowley
James Lucek-Rowley
Michael McCarthy
Michael McCarthy
Author LinkedIn connections

In Australian Financial Services and Leasing Pty Ltd v Hills Industries Ltd, 1 the High Court has unanimously dismissed the appeal of a finance company that had made payments by mistake and sought to recover them. The court held that the recipients had changed their position to such an extent that any repayment would be inequitable. An interesting factual matrix provided the platform for a comprehensive analysis of the change of position defence, its application and exactly what the basis of restitutionary relief is in Australia.

Background

Richard Skarzynski was a director and shareholder in various companies in the Total Concepts Projects group (TCP). Mr Skarzysnki and his companies were supplied with equipment by Hills Industries Ltd (Hills) and Bosch Security Systems Pty Ltd (Bosch). As a result of these transactions, entities within TCP owed both Hills and Bosch a signi?cant amount of money.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from