Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 MARCH 2016

Agreeing on civil penalties

Like any party to a civil proceeding, regulators can make submissions or reach agreement on an appropriate penalty.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The High Court has removed any concerns over the ability of regulators to make submissions to courts on the appropriate response to a breach of civil penalty provisions.

In Commonwealth v Director, Fair Work Building Inspectorate, the High Court considered the role of regulators in bringing civil penalty proceedings and concluded that, like any party to a civil proceeding, regulators are able to make submissions or reach agreements on what they consider the appropriate penalty to be.

Background

The Director of the Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate brought civil penalty proceedings in the Federal Court against two unions involved in unlawful industrial action and in breach of a civil penalty provision under the Building and Construction Industry Improvement Act 2005 (Cth). The unions and the Director had filed an agreed statement of facts and submissions on the civil penalty amount that the parties were seeking from the Court. The agreed facts said that,

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from