Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 FEBRUARY 2015

The same but different: Heading off generic market entry which does not patent infringe

This sparked interest in the potential for patentees to prevent non-patent infringing generic pharmaceutical products.

AustraliaIntellectual Property

A preliminary discovery application brought in the Federal Court of Australia by GlaxoSmithKline Australia Pty Ltd (GSK) shortly before Christmas has sparked interest in the potential for patentees to prevent non-patent infringing generic pharmaceutical products entering the Australian market.

Background facts

The paracetamol market in Australia saw significant legal attention in the last months of 2014. In October, following GSK's commencement of proceedings, Apotex Pty Ltd and Generic Partners Pty Ltd gave undertakings to the Court not to supply generic products (which they had admitted an intention to sell) falling within the scope of GSK's sustained released paracetamol patent (the Patent), pending the outcome of infringement and invalidity proceedings in respect of the Patent. GSK has marketed its sustained release products, Panadol Back and Neck Long-Lasting and Panadol Osteo, in Australia since 2000 and Panadol Osteo is the only long-release paracetamol

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from