Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 JUNE 2023

Market Intelligence Thought Leadership Award Winner

TCT Vs Polaris

Recent Australian Federal Court decision TCT Group Pty Ltd v Polaris IP Pty Ltd [2022] FCA 1493 is particularly notable for its exploration of support in an external document...

AustraliaIntellectual Property

Recent Australian Federal Court decision TCT Group Pty Ltd v Polaris IP Pty Ltd [2022] FCA 1493 is particularly notable for its exploration of support in an external document – namely an earlier filed patent application. The decision provides a cautionary tale to patent applicants and legal practitioners alike, addressing essential considerations for both sufficiency and support requirements under Australian patent law, and interparty communications with an alleged infringer.

Background

Polaris IP Pty Ltd ("Polaris") is the owner of certified Australian Innovation Patents AU 2020100485 ("the '485 Patent") and AU 2020102918 ("the '918 Patent"), the claims of which are each broadly directed to soft closing hinges such as those for glass-panelled swimming pool access doors. On 1 July 2020 Polaris wrote to TCT Group Pty Ltd ("TCT") alleging its patents were infringed by the latter's "Orion" range of hinges, and threatening proceedings. Proceedings commenced on 9

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from