Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 JULY 2013

Pay for delay: The US Supreme Court rules on reverse patent settlements

The US Court ruled that reverse patent settlements, or "pay for delay" agreements, may be illegal under anti-trust laws.

AustraliaIntellectual Property
Focus: Federal Trade Commission v Actavis, Inc.,et al No. 12-416
Services: Intellectual Property & Technology, Commercial, Disputes & Litigation
Industry Focus: Medical & Pharmaceutical

Both sides are claiming victory following a decision of the United States Supreme Court, in the long running "pay for delay" saga.1

The Court has ruled that reverse patent settlements, commonly known as "pay for delay" agreements, may be illegal under anti-trust laws, and must be considered from the perspective of both patent law and anti-trust law. Importantly, the Court has indicated that while there may be circumstances in which such arrangements are legal, moving forward, drug companies will need to carefully consider the use of such arrangements.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from