Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 OCTOBER 2019

Case Note: Disputed patent application: Olvey & Sketo v Danko & Gabrys [2019] APO 42

This case highlights the importance of detailed records throughout the ideation and development stage of your invention.

AustraliaIntellectual Property

This case highlights the importance of maintaining comprehensive records throughout the ideation and development stage of your invention.

Summary

The Delegate to the Commissioner, Isaac Tan, held in Olvey & Sketo v Danko & Gabrys [2019] APO 42 that there was insufficient evidence submitted to make a determination under Section 32 of the Patents Act 1990 regarding disputes between applicants, and therefore the application will remain in the names of all five applicants.

The listed applicants for Australian Application No. 2016259383 titled "Corrugated Pallet" include Sean G. Gumbert, Joseph J. Danko, Douglas A. Olvey, James L. Sketo and Christopher W. Gabrys. The listed inventors, Sketo and Olvey, filed a request under s32 for the Commissioner to make a determination to remove Gumbert, Danko, and Gabrys as applicants.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from