Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 JUNE 2019

Spontaneous combustion: How spontaneous does it need to be - in a damages insurance claim?

The Federal Court considered the term "spontaneous" in the context of a perils exclusion clause in an insurance policy.

AustraliaInsurance

In the recent case of Dalby Bio-Refinery Ltd v Allianz Australian Insurance Limited [2019] FCAFC 85, the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia considered the meaning of the term "spontaneous" in the context of a perils exclusion clause.

The plaintiff, Dalby Bio Refinery (Dalby), was a manufacturer and distributor of ethanol.

On 2 March 2016, fire and emergency services attended Dalby's bio-refinery in South East Queensland due to smoke having been detected. Stockpiles of dry distillers' grain and solubles (product) in four bays showed signs of possible fire damage. Whilst testing of the product indicated that it was unlikely to develop into large scale flaming combustion, the contents of three of the bays were discarded due to having a "burnt smell" and being discoloured.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from