Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 APRIL 2017

Reconsidering Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) as a bodily injury

Medical evidence was necessary to show actual physical damage to brain to satisfy the definition of a "bodily injury".

AustraliaInsurance

IN BRIEF - MEDICAL EVIDENCE NECESSARY TO SHOW ACTUAL PHYSICAL DAMAGE TO BRAIN TO SATISFY "BODILY INJURY" IN PEL-AIR APPEAL

The New South Wales Court of Appeal decision in Pel-Air Aviation Pty Ltd v Casey [2017] NSWCA 32 denies plaintiffs suffering from a PTSD condition a claim under the Montreal Convention in the absence of compelling evidence of physical change to the brain.

PEL-AIR'S SUCCESSFUL APPEAL IS GOOD NEWS FOR AVIATION INSURERS

On 24 June 2015, we reported on the decision of Casey v Pel Air Aviation in our article entitled Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) leads to compensation following aviation accident, and indicated that the damages award was a landmark decision for aviation insurers when a substantial award of damages was handed down.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from