Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 AUGUST 2008

Quintano –v– B W Rose Pty Ltd & Ors

On 5 August 2008 Justice Brereton of the Supreme Court handed down judgment in the matter of Quintano –v– B W Rose Pty Ltd & Ors [2008] NSWSC 793.

AustraliaInsurance

On 5 August 2008 Justice Brereton of the Supreme Court handed down judgment in the matter of Quintano –v– B W Rose Pty Ltd & Ors [2008] NSWSC 793.

This case arose out of a professional indemnity insurer declining indemnity on the grounds of certain exclusions in the policy. Justice Brereton ruled that:

1. If a claim has foundation in a matter, then the claim arose from that matter, irrespective of the formulation of the pleadings; and

2. Where a policy excludes cover for claims arising from a specified matter, it is the insurer's intention to decline indemnity where its existence is asserted, with no need for the matter to objectively exist.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from