Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 SEPTEMBER 2012

No lights in car park – trip and fall

The Court found that the Council breached its duty of care and the plaintiff was not guilty of contributory negligence.

AustraliaInsurance
Iain Miller
Iain Miller

Upper Lachlan Shire Council v Rodgers [2012] NSWCA 259

Judgment date: 23 August 2012

Jurisdiction: New South Wales Court of Appeal1

In Brief

  • Section 5B of the Civil Liability Act 2002 (the CLA)needs to be considered in determining negligence. However, this may be implicitly done by reference to how a trial is fought by competent counsel.
  • Obviousness of a risk is a factor that may be taken into account when considering the response of a reasonable person.
  • The standard of care required of a person who suffered harm is that of a reasonable person in the position of that person as required by s 5R of the CLA. The same principles are applied as when determining breach of duty under s 5B(1) of the CLA.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from