Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 JULY 2016

Land transport: recklessness in insurance policy

The Court's decision illustrates the high bar that insurers must overcome to rely on an exclusion for recklessness.

AustraliaInsurance
Aaron Potter
Aaron Potter

Road

Australian decisions

Barrie Toepfer Earthmoving and Land Management Pty Ltd v CGU Insurance Ltd[2016] NSWCA 67

The NSW Court of Appeal recently determined that the onus of proof is on insurers to prove an insured's recklessness if they wish to rely upon an exclusion in a commercial motor vehicle insurance policy for damage caused by recklessness and breach of a condition to take reasonable care and comply with statutory obligations.

On 15 April 2003, two employees of Barrie Toepfer Earthmoving and Land Management Pty Ltd were transporting a 16 tonne excavator from North Arm Cove to Wyee in New South Wales by prime mover and low loader. The vehicle was driven by Mr Luck and in the passenger seat was Mr Wyborn, the operator of the excavator. As the vehicle was driven over Hexham Bridge near Newcastle, the arm of the excavator struck a number of the overhead sections of the bridge, causing more than $12.8 million worth of damage.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from