Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 DECEMBER 2025

Insuring the unintended: How ambiguous wording can shift the risk landscape

Recent judgment serves as a salient reminder to insurers of the importance of clear & unambiguous policy wording.

AustraliaInsurance
Shayma Sorefan
Shayma Sorefan
Olivia Giacomelli
Olivia Giacomelli
Author LinkedIn connections

On 17 October 2025, the Western Australian Court of Appeal handed down its decision in AAI Limited trading as GIO v Pilbara Iron Company (Services) Pty Ltd [2025] WASCA 150, reinforcing the legal principles governing labour hire arrangements.

The judgment underscores the judiciary's increasing willingness to recognise the transferability of vicarious liability to host employers. The judgment also serves as a salient reminder to insurers of the importance of clear and unambiguous policy wording, particularly where indemnity provisions extend to common law liability. In such cases, insurers may find themselves exposed to substantial indemnity obligations irrespective of whether the principal's liability is direct or vicarious.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from