Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 MAY 2026

Insurers Not Directly Joined To Proceedings For Claimed Defective Plumbing Work

Whether the Court of Appeal should overturn a decision of the County Court to refuse to directly join the respondents’ insurers to a proceeding seeking damages for allegedly defective plumbing works carried out by the respondents, and whether there was any error in the trial judge’s interpretation of the relevant Ministerial Order.

AustraliaInsurance

Court delivers clarity on direct joinder of insurers as respondents in plumber’s warranty claims.

In issue

  • Whether the Court of Appeal should overturn a decision of the County Court to refuse to directly join the respondents’ insurers to a proceeding seeking damages for allegedly defective plumbing works carried out by the respondents, and whether there was any error in the trial judge’s interpretation of the relevant Ministerial Order.

The background

Cathy O’Connell (Ms O’Connell) was the owner of two properties in Windsor, 11 Lincoln Place and 14 Mary Street (the properties) and engaged Lentelle Pty Ltd (the builder) to perform works at the properties.

In late 2022, Ms O'Connell commenced proceedings in the County Court of Victoria against the builder, alleging several breaches of the relevant building contracts, including defects in the work. During the proceeding, there was consensus between the experts that a substantial amount of the defects was the result of

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from