Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 JULY 2013

Foreseeable risk: Employer gets out of the deep end

The decision demonstrates the need for an injury to be a foreseeable risk to establish liability against an employer.

AustraliaInsurance
Alexa Reith
Alexa Reith
Mark Wiemers
Mark Wiemers
Author LinkedIn connections
Focus: Micallef v Endeavour Foundation [2013] QDC 142
Services: Insurance
Industry Focus: Insurance

Introduction

The decision in Micallef v Endeavour Foundation [2013] QDC 142 demonstrates the need for an injury to fall within the scope of a foreseeable risk in order to establish liability against an employer.

Case

The plaintiff was a disability support worker employed by the defendant. The plaintiff and a co-worker had taken two children to a local swimming pool. After the children had exited the pool, the plaintiff had re-entered the pool to retrieve grapes which one of the children had thrown into the water. Both children were with her co-worker outside the pool at this time. As the plaintiff was resurfacing, one of the children jumped feet first on top of her, causing the plaintiff to sustain injury to her neck.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from