Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 FEBRUARY 2024

Court clarifies scope of 'agent' and 'subcontractor' in construction risks insurance policy

Insurers and underwriters should ensure that the commercial intent of the parties is reflected in the policy wording.

AustraliaInsurance

In the recent decision of Mie Force Pty Ltd v Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd [2024] NSWCA 23, the NSW Court of Appeal has clarified the scope of the terms 'agent' and 'subcontractor' in the definition of 'Named Insured' in a Construction Risks – General Liability Policy.

In overturning the first instance decision, the Court of Appeal found that the term 'agent' should be constructed in accordance with its strict legal meaning.

Background

Rohrig (NSW) Pty Ltd (Rohrig) was the principal contractor for a project at the General Gordon Hotel, Sydenham (Hotel). Rohrig subcontracted demolition works to Rhino Commercial Stripouts Pty Ltd (Rhino Stripouts) as part of the project. The insurer, Allianz, issued the policy to Rohrig.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from