Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 MAY 2024

When can liquidators engage professional advisors without court approval?

Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Contributor
Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth is Australia’s leading independent law firm. We provide exceptional legal...

View firm profile
Explore more from Corrs Chambers Westgarth

This case is a caution to liquidators engaging solicitors or other professional advisors in the course of their duties.

AustraliaInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

The Supreme Court of Western Australia has recently delivered judgment in the case of Kitay v Frigger [No 2] [2024] WASC 113. The Court held that some, but not all, long-term costs agreements and retainers entered into by a liquidator required court approval.

Key Takeaways

  • Depending on the circumstances, a liquidator may require court approval to enter into a long-term costs agreement or retainer.
  • Court approval will not be required for long-term agreements the liquidator enters into that concern the provision of advice regarding the winding up or performance of the liquidator's duties.
  • Court approval will be required if the liquidator enters into a long-term agreement as an agent or representative of the company, if the company is a party to the agreement, or if the company takes the benefit of the services to be provided.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

    Lawyers Weekly Law firm of the year 2021                  
Employer of Choice for Gender Equality (WGEA)

See more popular content from