Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 OCTOBER 2021

Market Intelligence Thought Leadership Award Winner

Statutory demands and commercial reasonableness?

Creditors should consider whether issuing a statutory demand is the appropriate avenue to pursue payment of a debt.

AustraliaInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

The two step review process required to issue a compliant statutory demand was recently confirmed by the Supreme Court of New South Wales in in the matter of Matrix Group Co Pty Ltd [2021] NSWSC 1042.

TPS Group Services Pty Limited (TPS), as a building subcontractor to Matrix Group Pty Limited (Matrix), claimed that, after issuing an invoice for works completed in the amount of $46,485.45, the parties had agreed to settle the invoice for the amount of $40,000, such agreement being supported by a payment schedule issued under section 14 of the Building & Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW). Subsequent discussions between TPS and Matrix reflected that Matrix would assess TPS's claim as $40,000 on "two conditions", being that TPS returned to site as soon as possible and that TPS remove the payment default against Matrix (Agreement).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from