Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 JUNE 2018

Interim receivers and managers: Remuneration Update

This decision reinforces the role of interim receivers and managers and the Court approach to fixing their remuneration.

AustraliaInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring
Phoebe Martin (Formerly With Bartier Perry)
Phoebe Martin (Formerly With Bartier Perry)
Author LinkedIn connections

A recent judgment of the Supreme Court of NSW, In the matter of Say Enterprises Pty Ltd [2018] NSWSC 396 provides timely guidance to interim receivers and managers to ensure that work is properly and reasonably performed pursuant to their appointment.

A receiver and manager is entitled to the costs properly incurred in the discharge of their ordinary duties, the amount of which may be fixed by the Court. The onus is on the receiver and manager to show that the amount of the remuneration claimed is fair and reasonable and that the work was properly performed in the course of the administration.

In this case, on 10 August 2017, Antony Resnick and David Solomons were appointed interim receivers and managers of Say Enterprises Pty Ltd until 25 September 2017. The primary objective of their appointment was to secure the company's bank accounts and continue trading operations on an interim basis (41 days). This had been substantially achieved by 11 August 2017, after

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from