Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 JULY 2024

In admitting proofs of debts, liquidators do not create new liabilities

Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Contributor
Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth is Australia’s leading independent law firm. We provide exceptional legal...

View firm profile
Explore more from Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Admission of a proof of debt by a liquidator was not akin to a judgment or settlement

AustraliaInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

This week's TGIF considers a recent decision of the Supreme Court of New South Wales ( Forex Capital Trading Pty Ltd (in liquidation) v Invesus Group Limited [2024] NSWSC 867). Justice Ball determined that admission of a proof of debt by a liquidator was not akin to a judgment or settlement, and that such an admission did not create a new liability of the company.

Key Takeaways

  • Liquidators are given broad powers to realise assets of the company and distribute them in accordance with the scheme in Div 6, Pt 5.6 of the Corporations Act. However, a liquidator is not determining the liabilities of the company when administering the scheme.

  • When dealing with proofs of debts, a liquidator is acting in a quasi-judicial capacity, undertaking a statutory task as an officer of the court, and is not acting as an agent of the company.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

    Lawyers Weekly Law firm of the year 2021                  
Employer of Choice for Gender Equality (WGEA)

See more popular content from