Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 OCTOBER 2017

A better outcome for whom? Unpacking the safe harbour reforms

A central theme in Australia's safe harbour legislation is a director's duty to find a "better outcome for the company".

AustraliaInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring
Services: Corporate & Commercial, Restructuring & Insolvency
Industry Focus: Financial Services

What you need to know

  • Australia's safe harbour legislation is not explicit as to the meaning of, or the considerations that will inform, a "better outcome for the company" which is the concept underpinning the protection afforded to directors under the new regime.
  • Rather than attempting to balance often misaligned interests of shareholders and different classes of creditors, directors ought to focus on the 'enterprise value' of the company.
  • Such an approach is consistent with directors' duties in the zone of insolvency and aligns with the rationale of the safe harbour reforms, being the avoidance of value destruction.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from