Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 MAY 2016

The perilous placement of election signage

The Appellant was alleged to have enabled her election signs to be placed in the local area without a necessary licence.

AustraliaGovernment, Public Sector

In the recent decision of Petersen v Ipswich City Council [2016] QDC 7, Bradley DCJ found that there was no case to answer and set aside the conviction of the Appellant, who was alleged to have enabled her election signs to be placed on an Ipswich City Council local government area without the necessary licence.

Facts

An appeal was brought before the District Court by Patricia Petersen who had been convicted of three charges relating to the placement of election signage within an Ipswich City Council local government area without a licence, in contravention of section 5 of Ipswich City Council Local Law No. 3 (Commercial Licensing) 2013. At the time, the Appellant was leader of the Australian Independents and a candidate for Senate in the 2013 Commonwealth elections. Although it was determined that the Appellant had not placed the signs herself, the matter before the Court was whether, per section 7 Criminal Code (QLD), it could be shown she had "enabled" the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from