Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 JULY 2026

Protest Group Los­es Appeal To Obtain Gov­ern­ment documents

Two recent NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal decisions examine the limits of public access to government documents under the GIPA Act in the context of the controversial Bowdens Silver Project near Mudgee. The rulings address whether community groups can obtain cabinet materials, legal advice, and commercial-in-confidence briefings related to major development projects, establishing important precedents for balancing transparency against government and commercial protections.

AustraliaGovernment, Public Sector

On 2 July 2026, the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal (NCAT) delivered two closely related decisions in proceedings brought by the Mudgee Region Health Alliance (the Alliance), a community group protesting the proposed Bowdens Silver Project (an open-cut silver mine near Mudgee).

The cases — Mudgee Region Health Alliance v Minister for Finance, Domestic Manufacturing and Government Procurement and Natural Resources [2026] NSWCATAD 195 and Mudgee Region Health Alliance v Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure [2026] NSWCATAD 194 — centred on access applications under the Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 (NSW) (GIPA Act). They highlight the tension between public transparency, accountability, and protections for government processes and commercial interests in major development projects.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from