Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 AUGUST 2012

Nothing improper in WA Planning Minister's intervention in controversial resource development

The WA Court inferred that a substantial purpose of the intervention was the orderly and proper planning of the site.

AustraliaGovernment, Public Sector

Key Points:

Industry will need to evaluate the need for and timing of high-level government intervention, its impact on environmental assessment processes and public reaction.

The recent decision of Hunter v The Minister for Planning [2012] WASC 247 puts a spotlight on the intervention by planning authorities when major development pressures (such as in the resources industry) coincide with a transitioning planning framework.

Background

Goolarabooloo Law Boss Richard Hunter is an opponent of the controversial development by Woodside Energy Ltd at James Price Point in the Kimberley region of Western Australia.

Mr Hunter had brought proceedings that challenged the grant of planning approval by the Kimberley Joint Development Assessment Panel. Prior to the hearing of that challenge, the Minister for Planning amended the statutory planning framework. This amendment meant that planning approval would not be needed for Woodside's development if the Panel's

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from