Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 SEPTEMBER 2026

Measuring What Matters: What Does “Effective” Financial Crime Prevention Actually Look Like?

Financial crime prevention is shifting from compliance-focused frameworks to outcomes-driven regulation that prioritizes measurable harm reduction. Organizations must now demonstrate how their controls disrupt criminal networks and protect victims, not just meet reporting obligations.

AustraliaGovernment, Public Sector

Outcomes driven regulation means increasing expectations for organisations to demonstrate how controls reduce harm, disrupt criminal networks and achieve measurable outcomes beyond merely complying with obligations. Financial crime frameworks alone are no longer enough.

Editorial Team

Financial crime is often discussed in terms of what businesses need to do to comply with obligations, such as implement controls, file reports and maintain frameworks. But how do we know this is effective in reducing financial crime?

For victims of scams and fraud, the impact rarely stops at the initial loss. It can linger in ways that are harder to quantify, whether that’s stress, loss of trust or the effect it has on relationships. Businesses see a different version of that impact, often through reputational damage and the longer-term cost of remediation. If success is measured only by what is reported or documented, it is easy to lose sight of that broader picture.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from