Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 DECEMBER 2012

How reliable is the doctrine of executive necessity?

The case provides useful guidance on a number of issues the Commonwealth needs to consider when terminating a contract.

AustraliaGovernment, Public Sector

By Richard Morrison

The scope of the doctrine of executive necessity, the public interest-based concept that contracts and agreements are unenforceable if they fetter statutory executive discretions and powers, has been examined by a recent Supreme Court of NSW decision.

In NSW Rifle Association Inc v Commonwealth of Australia, the court examined the limits of the doctrine of executive necessity and found the Commonwealth had an implied contractual duty to act reasonably and in good faith.

Importantly, the case provides useful guidance on a number of issues the Commonwealth needs to consider when managing the termination of contracts.

Background to the case

The New South Wales Rifle Association (NSWRA) occupies the ANZAC Rifle Range at Malabar, where the local member has long campaigned for the land to be transferred to the State of NSW for use as a national park.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from