Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 SEPTEMBER 2012

When is a penalty clause not a penalty clause?

The High Court case held that a clause can be a penalty clause even if it is not triggered by a breach of the contract.

AustraliaFinance and Banking

The recent High Court case on bank fees, Andrews v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited [2012] HCA 30, has garnered much media attention. Beyond the immediate impact on banks' terms and conditions, the decision has implications for a wide range of contracts, particularly in other financial services contexts, construction and major projects IT and services contracts generally.

What is a penalty clause?

Parties to a contract obviously have an interest in keeping the other side to the bargain. The traditional view is that a penalty clause penalises a party for breaching the contract by requiring it to pay a specified sum that is extravagant and unconscionable in amount in comparison with the greatest loss that could conceivably be proved to have followed from the breach (for example it is not a genuine pre-estimate of the damage suffered by the other party). If a clause is a penalty, it is void.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from