Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 OCTOBER 2014

Trouble in paradise — can an SMSF member be forcibly removed?

This article examines what happens when SMSF trustees cannot agree and the ability of a trustee to remove a member.

AustraliaFinance and Banking

By Krishna Skandakumar ([email protected]), Lawyer, DBA Lawyers

Often self managed superannuation funds ('SMSFs') are created with the best of intentions, whether to provide for a second spouse, create a contingency for a child, entering property ventures with a business partner, etc. But the most important question — which is almost always overlooked — is what happens if it all goes wrong?
This article examines the ability of an SMSF trustee to forcibly remove a member. However, it starts by asking a preliminary question: what happens when trustees cannot agree?

Do trustees have to act unanimously?

Strictly speaking, trustees must act unanimously. Or, to phrase this another way, if trustees cannot agree, no valid decision can be made. This is a well-established principle of trust law famously stated in the case of Dawson v Dawson [1945] VLR 99 as follows:

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from