Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 DECEMBER 2014

Looks can be deceiving: Responsible Entities get a high reminder on constitutional drafting

Responsible Entities may find their scheme constitutions do not confer powers for in specie distributions.

AustraliaFinance and Banking

Key Points:

Responsible Entities may find their scheme constitutions do not confer powers for in specie distributions.

In the recent decision of the High Court, Wellington Capital Ltd v ASIC & Anor [2014] HCA 43, it was held that a Responsible Entity could not make an in specie distribution to members because the constitution of the managed investment scheme did not specifically confer this power.

Commercial implications

The case is a reminder to Responsible Entities (RE) on the importance of constitutional drafting.

Constitutional provisions are interpreted against the context of the Scheme Constitution as a whole, and general constitutional provisions granting broad powers may be insufficient to grant an RE power to conduct in specie distributions (transfer of scheme property rather than by sale of property and distribution of proceeds) to members.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from