Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 31 MARCH 2018

Significant Contributing Factor no more

The Tribunal considered that the worker no longer suffered from an injury significantly contributed to by employment.

AustraliaEmployment and HR

Shales and Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2017] AATA 1369

Key Points

  • Commonwealth Bank defeats permanent impairment and non-economic loss claim.
  • The Tribunal was not satisfied that Ms Shales continued to suffer from an injury that was significantly contributed to by her employment.

Background

Ms Shales worked for the Commonwealth Bank of Australia (CBA). On 25 November 2014, Ms Shales made a claim for a psychological injury allegedly caused by workplace bullying.

The CBA had initially denied liability for Ms Shales' claim but, following a review of own motion, accepted liability for "anxiety and depressed mood".

On 15 September 2015, Ms Shales lodged a claim for permanent impairment and non-economic loss. The CBA denied the claim on the basis that Ms Shales' had not met the 10% threshold required under subsection 24(7) of the Safety Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (Cth) (the SRC Act).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from