Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 SEPTEMBER 2023

Employer's authorisation for overtime implied by conduct

The Federal Court's Fair Work division recently handed down an important ruling on how overtime may be authorised by employers.

AustraliaEmployment and HR

The Fair Work division of the Federal Court has recently handed down an important ruling on how overtime may be authorised by employers.

In Australian Salaried Medical Officers' Federation v Peninsula Health [2023] FCA 939, a class action, the court has determined that employees who worked regular and extensive overtime without obtaining formal permission did so with "implied' authorisation from their employer.

Proceedings for unpaid overtime were brought by a group of junior doctors, against their employer Peninsula Health – a metropolitan public health service in Victoria. The group members alleged that they were not paid their entitlements for overtime worked, even though it was not formally authorised by the employer, and despite the fact they had previously signed timesheets that did not include the extra hours worked. It was contended that this overtime work was performed with the authority of Peninsula Health, and as such the doctors were entitled to

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from