Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 JUNE 2021

Dust disease claims not covered by PIPA regime

This case confirmed that a secondary psychiatric injury from a dust-related condition is exempt from the PIPA process.

AustraliaEmployment and HR

In the recent Queensland decision of Coleman v Caesarstone Australia Pty Ltd & Ors [2021] QSC 125, an applicant successfully obtained a declaration that the Personal Injuries Proceedings Act 2002 (Qld) (PIPA) did not apply to his secondary psychiatric injury caused by his dust-related condition.

Facts

The applicant, James Coleman, is a 35-year old man previously employed as a stonemason. He alleged he sustained injuries as a result of occupational exposure to respirable crystalline silica dust during the course of his employment from approximately 2005 to October 2018.

The applicant's primary injury is accelerated silicosis. He was subsequently diagnosed with a moderately severe adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood, caused by and secondary to the diagnosis of accelerated silicosis.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from