Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 JULY 2025

Dismissal for dissent?

Recent case guides the extent to which employees can "dissent" from the employer on matters that are the subject of political debate.

AustraliaEmployment and HR

The recent unfair dismissal decision of the Fair Work Commission, Shaun Turner v Darebin City Council [2025] F WC 1763, in which Deputy President Clancy held that the dismissal of an employee for, among other things, alleged comments in response to an Acknowledgment of Country before a 'toolbox' meeting, was unfair, has garnered significant media attention and turned the Applicant (Mr Turner) into a cause célèbre in some circles.

While the merits of the arguments advanced by Mr Turner against an Acknowledgment of Country at the commencement of toolbox meetings (which was a new practice the Council had adopted) are beyond the scope of this article, the decision of the FWC as to whether his statements warranted termination is worth exploration, especially as it offers a guide as to the extent to which employees can "dissent" from the employer on matters that are the subject of political or social debate.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

For further information please contact:

Michael Byrnes, Partner
Phone: + 61 2 9233 5544
Email: [email protected]

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from